Environmentalist mob

All for the sake of animal welfare, or so it seems to be nowadays.
For every subspecies that mother nature has gifted our world with, we Dutchies have an action group that strive for the common welfare of the animal in question.

Ducks, chicken, sheep, cows, rabbits; all have certain groups favoring the quality of life of the animals, and on top of that we have several environmentalist groups striving to diminish animal-suffering and consumption of meat.
We know GroenFront!, Partij van de Dieren, and the one I’m discussing here: NVB. The Dutch Society for Vegetarians.

I know, they’re not particularly an animal-rights group judging by their name, but recent plans to make a vegetarian day obligatory in the lunch-halls of governmental organizations suggests otherwise.
Yes, you read it well: the NVB suggests all canteens of governmental institutions (including schools and such) should not serve meat on one day in the week, preferably on Friday.
The reasoning: "We’ll save 40.000 animals’ lives, and it’s good for the environment!".

The thing is: already, about 90% of all concerned canteens are serving vegetarian meals, about half of those do that all days of the week, all year round. About 5 to 10 percent of all meals served is vegetarian; which would forcefully be increased to about 20% when this plan is executed.
Why do organizations think making something obligatory solves the issue, when the relationship between the effect and measure is not unmistakingly proven? Meat is not neccessarily bad for our environment: overconsumption of meat is. Like anyting that is not used sensibly. Apparently, the NVB thinks they can save the lives of about 40.000 animals by merely changing the destination for their meat.
A large quantity of the Dutch meat is exported because of it’s excellent quality, and thus any meat that is designated for the Dutch market, yet remains unconsumed is just sold to someone else.
It could wind up as food for other animals, or even be processed in other, miscellaneous, food-products.

NVB: start thinking please.
I happen to know reddish meat contains a lot of proteïnes which are good for your blood and thus for the brain…

Book galore

Yesterday I went to the BookFestival in Ahoy’ Rotterdam.

This grande sale of mostly crappish (but new) books it held over 6 times a year throughout The Netherlands and Flanders. It houses vast amounts of really cheap books, and books you probably will never ever read or see anywhere else because of their, probably justified, obscurity.
They sell the leftovers from the Centraal Boekhuis in our country, and do it for prices below any standard. Most often, a book can be purchased for below €5,- or less. A lot of children’s titles are available for €1,50 or even €0,75. Bargains by any standard.

Me being a book-enthusiast was not able to resist to go there, and found one of my favorites: The Hitchhikers’ Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams.
All 5 books neatly bundled in a box, for €8,99. As competitive as any sale. (Bol has it in stock, and is with transport the same price.) Oh well, you can’t win’m all.

51qcar8wvfl_ss500_.jpg0330443615.gifanswer_to_life.png

/Captain Obvious
/lifelog

"Free" knowledge

Wouldn’t we all like to get that?
Free knowledge, in a society like ours, where knowing stuff is the key to success and a bigger monthly paycheck.

In an effort to reduce the financial burden on (young) families, our Cabinet has ruled in their great wisdom all books in the Dutch version of High school (Middelbaar Onderwijs) should be supplied to all students, regardless of their financial situation or anything else.
As it happens under the cloak of cost reduction for all of those who have children between ages 12 and 18 – ages where kids tend to cost the most – this should relieve the pressure on the parents a bit.
Books are not cheap, and can easily cost up to €500 per child per year.

Now for the hard part: the money which has to be spent by our government to buy all books for these kids (about 120 million euro per year) has to be raised somehow. The question is: how?
After quite some debating over at the ministry of education and the cabinet a solution was found: it should come from raising the traffic fines and also charge the offendors with the transaction costs, a pile of money they had left over in case of rough times and the rapid introduction of revised taxing on gambling. All in all: by making several other things more expensive, something becomes cheaper. How ironic.

Secondly, the teachers concerned are quite worried about the fact that a fixed-pricing system, where the government is the sole buyer, could lead to lower quality of books as the need to compete with eachother on that quality by the editors is now gone. Also, they are foreseeing the misuse of the extra money handed to the schools, without it being used to buy books. The teachers demand tools to check whether the right amount of money has been spent on books, and not on trips to the Efteling, or the redecoration of the office of the head of the school.

Ok, all problems and issues now are overcome, as schools have promised to buy new books on a regular basis, and will use the money only to buy books. There have not been demonstrations against the raises as proposed, nor has anyone thought of the economic consequences of a (reversed) state monopoly on the market for schoolbooks.

Now for the fun part: due to regulations superimposed on Dutch laws by the European Union, projects which exceed (an amazingly low amount of) about €250.000 in price have to be tendered Europe-wide.
Thus: the (groups of) schools have to announce public tenders for them trying to buy schoolbooks, which can be quite lengthy procedures. And there’s the catch.
In 2008 (yes, that would be the year we now live in) the books should be free. And no, a tender-procedure lasts longer than the time that is between today and the start of the next schoolyear in august 2008.

How come this has not been noticed by anyone before?
Oh well: we are stuck with it now, until a new cabinet sees the ridicule of the proposed free availability of schoolbooks, and reverses the law. That’s democracy for you!

How do you feel on this topic? Should books be free? Should the procedure have been more thought out?

The disadvantages of a dSLR

Besides the commonly understood disadvantage of size and weight of a dSLR, there’s another one: money.

It seems to be an endless route: every time there’s more money to be spent on accessories, lenses and cleaning. I can hear you ask: cleaning? What?
My reply will be: the sensor. Every time you change lenses, there’s the possibility of dust or other particles entering the camera and being attracted to the statically charged sensor. The particles get stuck on it, and give blurs and spots on all pictures taken after that.
Not surprisingly, that sucks.

Therefore, after getting it cleaned professionally at a camera-store in Capelle a/d IJssel, I bought my own clensing-kit. I’m now the proud owner of a small bellows, and three sets of sensor swabs.
That’ll keep my camera and pictures nice and clean. ;)

1920.jpgcpcgwd.JPG

Oeh! I even forgot to mention the fact I also bought a remote trigger for my camera, the Nikon ML-L3 Remote Control.
In fact it’s just a infrared-transmitter capable of transmitting only one signal which also is equipped with just one button, but it works. ;)

zb29fe9966fc649771da02130710985ea.jpg

Public transportation in distress – part II

After the recent publication of the news that German students have successfully cracked the first layer of protection of the OV-chipcards which can be used with a subscription to travel with public transportation in the Rotterdam area, more news surrounding this system has surfaced yesterday.

A couple of Dutch students from the university of Nijmegen has successfully copied the throw-away version of the ov-chipcard, enabling them to travel for free as a new copy can be made without too much added effort.
This news has ‘shocked’ our Tweede Kamer, and a ‘spoeddebat’ (urgent debate) is planned for the upcoming week (which by the way has been asked for last week after the first news).

About 1 million of the subscription-capable cards are currently used, whilst about 10.000 throw-away cards (dagkaarten) are in use. Impact is thus limited, as only these latter cards are vulnerable (still).
Again: the company responsible for the cards (TLS) is to blame for this, yet more info on the copying-method has to be provided fot both us and them to see how the system (and the security-features) will cope with this setback.

Edit1: Apparently, the security of the daycard is really weak as details and information are shared in plaintext between the card and the terminal; while the subscription-cards do this encrypted.
Also, more information on the ‘hack’ is available: the student has created a device called Ghost which copies all info on the card and can be used itself to open the metro-gates and travel on the credit of the original card. So far, it is unclear whether the Ghost can still be used when the mama-card has no credit left. Some indications point to this, yet reasoning from the technique it should not as the Ghost simply copies the identification of the card and can be used to travel off off the same credit as the mama-card.

Edit 2 (2008-01-16): The CPNB only ruled the Amsterdam-trial of the OV-chipcard to be illegal due to the fact the travel-data will be stored for the enormously lengthy time of 7 years! In addition to this, the Amsterdam public transportation company (GVB) planned to deliver personalized ads based on the travel-routine. Yet more info has to surface to say more about the technical implementation of the security-system, I’m still waiting for that to happen (and post about it ;) )

I’ll be posting updates whenever more news surfaces!