<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A nerdish dilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maartentijhof.nl/2008/09/08/a-nerdish-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maartentijhof.nl/2008/09/08/a-nerdish-dilemma/</link>
	<description>Coping with public and private transport since 2001</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maarten</title>
		<link>http://www.maartentijhof.nl/2008/09/08/a-nerdish-dilemma/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Maarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 06:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maartentijhof.nl/?p=532#comment-355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve succeeded in crashing Chrome several times now, all during regular surfing. I&#039;m not ready to call it a stable product yet, but it&#039;s kind of the nature of the thing: it&#039;s a beta. ;)

I agree on the screen-hogging though, the interface is much slicker and slimmer. I like!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve succeeded in crashing Chrome several times now, all during regular surfing. I&#8217;m not ready to call it a stable product yet, but it&#8217;s kind of the nature of the thing: it&#8217;s a beta. <img src='http://www.maartentijhof.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I agree on the screen-hogging though, the interface is much slicker and slimmer. I like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmo</title>
		<link>http://www.maartentijhof.nl/2008/09/08/a-nerdish-dilemma/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maartentijhof.nl/?p=532#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Feeling mostly the same way, although one big plus for Chrome for me is the more efficient use of screen real estate. Firefox just hogs more of it.

The stability is nice but I have little doubt that that&#039;ll be something Firefox improves pretty soon now.

All in all, the extra competition (because let&#039;s face it, IE6 and IE7 were only competitors numbers-wise, not functionality wise) will improve browsers in general, I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feeling mostly the same way, although one big plus for Chrome for me is the more efficient use of screen real estate. Firefox just hogs more of it.</p>
<p>The stability is nice but I have little doubt that that&#8217;ll be something Firefox improves pretty soon now.</p>
<p>All in all, the extra competition (because let&#8217;s face it, IE6 and IE7 were only competitors numbers-wise, not functionality wise) will improve browsers in general, I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

